Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Blog 2

Bob Dylan’s music – as well as the protest music genre that was emerging onto the popular scene during Dylan’s early career – is ripe with rich, multi-dimensional material. In particular, his song “Blowin’ in the Wind”, because of its many covers and use in the civil rights movement, has been a source of analysis.

In a thesis submitted to Wake Forest University by Laura Bette Riddle, an analysis of what she calls the “movement persona” is given. The movement persona, she argues, is the social change movement that was so prevalent in the 1960’s. Because many protest songs arose during this time, the movement is often characterized by music. The movement persona is not only encompassed by the artist, but also by the audience. Riddle narrows her scope of the movement persona to that of the music of two great folk artists – Bob Dylan and Pete Seeger. Because both artists have had their songs covered various times by various musicians who also advocate for social change, their music is exemplary in a song’s impact on audiences.

In her abstract, she describes her analysis as an Aristotelian approach. She examines the artistic proofs – the ethos, pathos, and logos – as well as the major themes within various songs by both musicians. In regards to “Blowin’ in the Wind”, she specifically observes the relationship in the song between the singer and the audience and how the song’s lyrics (such as when Dylan refers to the audience as “my friend”) connect these two together. The song is rife with metaphor and Riddle attempts to explain these metaphors and seemingly elusive imageries and connects them with the social movement.

She attempts to explain, for example, the reference to the sea in a lyric from the first verse: “Yes’n how many seas must a white dove sail before she sleeps in the sand?” The sea – she argues – is representative of the social movement at the time. Movement is likened to a force of nature (much like the waves of the ocean) – something which is ultimately inevitable. The white dove represents the people of the movement. A white dove is often seen as a symbol of purity, of peace, or true intention. Dylan is illustrating the people of this social change (possibly the black community, as this song was – again – tied heavily to the civil rights movement) in the same light as the dove. The community will sail through various inevitable changes until it ultimately “sleeps in the sand” – the shore, a restful place that is not tumultuous.

Riddle continues in her analysis of the lyrics while noting the amount of pathos Dylan projects towards the audience. No doubt, the song conjures many emotions and its use as a protest song is clear to the song’s success in that area. It also connects singer to audience by asking the listener questions as well as in its use of the words “my friend” to describe this same audience.

After reading Riddle’s (as well as others’) analysis of Dylan’s song, I learned that the lyrics of a song are only half the story. In Riddle’s article, the true quest was finding the connection between the lyricist and the audience and the impact those lyrics has on that audience. While what Dylan sings in his song is important (and up for many different interpretations), what came about because of his words is just as significant – the covers, the use in protest rallies, etc. While the movement that arose during the time of this song is, for the most part, well known in American society, it will be interesting to see some of the direct outcomes that resulted from this particular song.

Works Cited
Riddle, Laura Bette. "BOB DYLAN, PETE SEEGER AND THE MOVEMENT PERSONA." Web. 28 Sept. 2015. <https://wakespace.lib.wfu.edu/bitstream/handle/10339/14687/RiddleMastersThesis2010.pdf>.

1 comment:

  1. Very impressive work here! You do an excellent job reviewing the article and pointing out the relevance of that work to your own.

    I think the idea of a "movement persona" is an intriguing label to put on Dylan. I wonder if there is any difference between the person who seeks that title v. someone who is recognized, even if they don't want the title?

    Great work here! Keep going!

    ReplyDelete